翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Pillows & Prayers ・ Pillows and Blankets ・ Pillowtex Corporation ・ Pillpinto District ・ Pills 'n' Thrills and Bellyaches ・ Pills Against the Ageless Ills ・ Pills Anonymous ・ Pills n Potions ・ Pills vs. Planes ・ Pills, porn and poker ・ Pillsbury ・ Pillsbury A-Mill ・ Pillsbury Bake-Off ・ Pillsbury Baptist Bible College ・ Pillsbury Chemical and Oil ・ Pillsbury Co. v. Milky Way Productions ・ Pillsbury Company ・ Pillsbury Crossing ・ Pillsbury Doughboy ・ Pillsbury Formation ・ Pillsbury Memorial Hall ・ Pillsbury Mountain Forest Fire Observation Station ・ Pillsbury Shale ・ Pillsbury State Forest ・ Pillsbury State Park ・ Pillsbury Summer House ・ Pillsbury Tower ・ Pillsbury Township, Swift County, Minnesota ・ Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman ・ Pillsbury, North Dakota Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Pillsbury Co. v. Milky Way Productions ： ウィキペディア英語版 Pillsbury Co. v. Milky Way Productions ''Pillsbury Co. v. Milky Way Productions,'' US No. C78-679A (1981), is a precedent-setting case that established fair-use protections for publication of registered trademarks in sexually explicit parodies in the United States. ''SCREW Magazine'', owned by Milky Way Productions, depicted a figure resembling the Pillsbury Dough Boy in various lewd sexual acts, including fellatio and sexual intercourse. The parody also featured Pillsbury's barrelhead trademark and two lines from the refrain of a two-stanza song entitled "The Pillsbury Baking Song." The picture was published in the February 20, 1978 issue of ''SCREW''. The Pillsbury Company filed an initial complaint several weeks after the original publication of the cartoon contending that the manner in which the magazine presented the picture implied that that the plaintiff, Pillsbury, placed it in the magazine as an advertisement. The plaintiff alleged several counts of copyright infringement, federal statutory, common law trademark infringement, violations of the Georgia Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act and of the Georgia "anti-dilution" statute, and several counts of tortious tarnishment of its marks, trade characters, and jingle. The judge presiding in the case, William Clark O'Kelley, issued a temporary injunction against the defendant on April 21, 1978, which the defendant disobeyed. In its final decision, the Atlanta Division of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia held that the pictures were editorial or social commentary and, thus, protected under fair use. It's unclear whether the defendant would have prevailed under 2006's Trademark Dilution Revision Act.〔 ==References== 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Pillsbury Co. v. Milky Way Productions」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.